According to the LPLC, in the current financial environment requests for lawyers to advise on loans and guarantees, particularly from second and third tier lenders, appear to be increasing.

Providing solicitors’ certificates in these matters is risky at the best of times, but where there is uncertainty about future financial and property market stability and clients under severe financial stress, extreme care needs to be taken.

Face to face verification of identity

Past experience has shown that when people are financially desperate, some use deception to borrow money. In this current economic environment more people will be financially distressed and this heightens the risk of borrowers presenting to practitioners who are not who they claim to be.

Verification of client identity in all cases is paramount to safeguard against identity fraud. 

Verifying identity when giving a solicitor’s certificate needs to be done face to face in person and the recent ARNECC notice does not change that because:

If the verification of identity can’t be done face to face lawyers should not sign the solicitor’s certificate. However, there is nothing stopping lawyers from giving advice to a guarantor or borrower via video conferencing about their obligations as a borrower or guarantor. 

An acknowledgement signed by the client that they received the advice from a lawyer may satisfy the lender in lieu of a solicitor’s certificate. If the lender insists on a solicitor’s certificate we could refer them to rule 11.8 which prohibits a solicitor, such as a solicitor acting for the lender, from aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring another solicitor to breach rule 11. Section 39 of the Uniform Law also makes it an offence for anyone, and this would include a lender, to induce a law practice or practitioner to breach the Uniform Law or any rules.

More than just witnessing

We all know that signing a solicitor’s certificate involves more than merely witnessing documents. We are certifying that we have advised our client on the general nature and effect of the loan or guarantee documents. Many of the claims received by the LPLC centre around allegations that the client was not given the appropriate advice.

When people are stressed, they do not always think clearly or remember what they have been told. In this context it is vital that we are very clear in our explanations to clients and that we confirm our advice in writing. It may take both oral and written explanations before the client understands the risks.

Where possible we give the client time to think about the decision before they sign. 

Critical issues for advice

The critical issues to consider and actions to take when advising a borrower or guarantor and providing a solicitor’s certificate are set out below.

Proactive practice management

In order to ensure all of these steps are taken and done well, now is a good opportunity to:

Our firm adopts best practice process and procedures that heed this guidance by the LPLC for Solicitors Certificates on a fixed fee basis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *